In one hour, President Bush delivers his seventh State-of-the-Union address. I can’t wait. I love watching the reactions of various senators, representatives, and Supreme Court justices to what the president says. There will be many shots of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Kerry, for example, since all three are expected to run for president in 2008. Hillary will have to appear suitably hostile if she is to endear herself to the moonbats. She must scowl, smirk, and stare disdainfully at the president. At no point may she show any warmth or levity, for that would signify that she’s not angry. Those who are angry and hateful insist that those who represent them be just as angry and hateful as they are, if not more so. The same thing happens in sport. If a coach or player doesn’t appear to be devastated by a loss, fans of that coach’s or player’s team are livid. “How can he take that loss so stoically?” the fans howl in outrage. They want to see frustration. They want to see fury. They want to see indignation. Right now, the hateful Left wants to see hatefulness in those who would carry their torch. I’ll comment on the speech later this evening as an addendum to this post. Feel free to post your own comments. I’m curious as to what you see as the strong and weak points of the speech. You may also comment on such things as style, composure, body language, and audience reaction.